The Pesticide Immunity Shield

Foreign chemical companies have launched a coordinated, multi-front campaign to secure unprecedented legal immunity for pesticide products in the United States. This strategic effort spans federal legislation, state laws, EPA rulemaking and Supreme Court litigation – all aimed at shielding manufacturers from accountability when their products cause harm to American farmers, property and communities.

Current Call to Action

If you haven’t already, Sign up here to help fight back.

Both the House of Representatives and the Senate have their own versions of an “Appropriation Bill” which is a regular spending bill that the chemical companies are using to sneak in their liability shield. Right now, we need calls to Congress to get them to reject the Appropriations Bill with the liability shield (Section 453) in it when it hits the floor of Congress for a vote in the two weeks.

WEEK OF SEPT 7th – Call Congress

Please help us call the congresspeople below.

Say something like this:

“I am calling regarding section 453 in the 2026 Interior Appropriations Bill. I am asking for Representative _____ to completely remove Section 453. This provision will remove accountability from chemical manufacturers, giving them immunity from lawsuits by defunding a critical type of label update under FIFRA. I do not support foreign chemical companies getting immunity. I do not want to lose my right to due process. Please protect American’s health and civil rights over the profits of these foreign chemical manufacturers.”

We have divided up the numbers into smaller groups – please call the group that has YOUR BIRTH MONTH next to it. Please call any other numbers outside of your birth month if you have time.

Background

Section 453 of the Federal House Interior Appropriations Bill has total pesticide immunity language included in it. Buried in this House spending bill is a provision that would let pesticide companies continue to hide behind outdated EPA pesticide assessments, poisoning our kids with no consequences.

What Section 453 does: Blocks the government from taking ANY ACTION if it differs in any way from the agency’s most recent health or cancer assessment. Unless they do a new assessment – which takes “no less than four years, and sometimes over twelve” according to the EPA – agencies would not be allowed to update safety warnings, food safety tolerances or guidance even if new science shows harm, companies ask for updates or the original assessment was based on fraud.

The trap: Pesticide companies need EPA approval to update label warnings. EPA can only act after they perform new health assessments, but the EPA does not do their own scientific tests. Their health assessments rely primarily on unpublished studies paid for by the pesticide company. Pesticide companies have also been known to hide evidence, manipulate science and deny that their products are causing harm. If they don’t like the outcome of a new EPA health assessment, they will sue to delay it even longer.

Meanwhile: People keep getting cancer, Parkinson’s, liver disease, ALS, infertility and more. But the companies claim “you can’t blame us – our product is safe – the EPA hasn’t told us to warn anyone!”

The worst part: Courts will be forced to agree with pesticide companies. Section 453 means that the EPA can’t approve updated warnings, allowing companies to argue it is impossible to comply with FIFRA’s labeling obligations and their duty to warn consumers about risks posed by their products under state product liability law. Because federal law overrides state law when it is impossible to comply with both, people who are seriously injured by pesticide companies wouldn’t be able to hold the company accountable for covering up the risks.

What’s at stake:

• Delayed updates on 57,000+ active products if they have outdated and inadequate warning labels
• Families at risk of losing their right to hold companies accountable when their loved ones get sick from chemical exposure
• Our kids pay the price while chemical giants get richer