The Pesticide Immunity Shield

Foreign chemical companies have launched a coordinated, multi-front campaign to secure unprecedented legal immunity for pesticide products in the United States. This strategic effort spans federal legislation, state laws, EPA rulemaking, and Supreme Court litigation—all aimed at shielding manufacturers from accountability when their products cause harm to American farmers, property, and communities.
Current Call to Action
Sign up here to help fight back.
Scroll down for phone numbers and script. Also, I have included a list of key staffers to email and/or call, which you can download.
Section 453 of the Federal House Interior Appropriations bill has Total Pesticide Immunity language included in it. Buried in this House spending bill is a provision that would let pesticide companies continue to hide behind outdated EPA pesticide assessments, poisoning our kids with no consequences.
What Section 453 does: Blocks the government from taking any action if it differs in any way from the agency’s most recent health or cancer assessment. Unless they do a new assessment—which takes “no less than four years, and sometimes over 12″ according to EPA—agencies would not be allowed to update safety warnings, food safety tolerances, or guidance even if new science shows harm, even if companies ask for updates, even if the original assessment was based on fraud.
The trap: Pesticide companies need EPA approval to update label warnings. EPA can only act after they perform new health assessments, but the EPA does not do their own scientific tests. Their health assessments rely primarily on unpublished studies paid for by the pesticide company. Pesticide companies have been known to hide evidence, manipulate science, and deny, deny, deny that their products are causing harm. And if they don’t like the outcome of a new EPA health assessment, they will sue to delay it even longer.
Meanwhile: People keep getting cancer. Kids keep getting poisoned. Companies say you “can’t blame us – our product is safe — EPA hasn’t told us to warn anyone!”
Here’s the worst part: Courts will be forced to agree with pesticide companies. Section 453 means EPA can’t approve updated warnings, allowing companies to argue it is impossible to comply with FIFRA’s labeling obligations and their duty to warn consumers about risks posed by their products under state product liability law.
Because federal law overrides state law when it is impossible to comply with both, people who are seriously injured by pesticide companies wouldn’t be able to hold the company accountable for covering up the risks.
Real example: Monsanto buried evidence that Roundup causes cancer. Their EPA health assessment hasn’t been (successfully) updated since 1993 – 30+ years ago. They’re asking SCOTUS to throw out cancer cases using this exact defense, right now.
What’s at stake:
-
Delayed updates on 57,000+ active products if they have outdated and inadequate warning labels
-
Families at risk of losing their right to hold companies accountable when their loved ones get sick from chemical exposure
-
Our kids pay the price while chemical giants get richer
If this passes: Pesticide companies can hide behind EPA’s outdated and inadequate labels – even when they know their pesticides cause cancer, brain damage, and birth and developmental defects.
“I am calling regarding Section 453 in the Federal House Appropriation Bill. Under no circumstance should pesticide companies get a free pass to continue poisoning American kids. This provision effectively provides foreign chemical companies like ChemChina a free pass to hide behind the EPA and poison Americans with no recourse. Remove Section 453 immediately.”
Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL-4)
|
(202) 225-4876
|
Rep. Mark Alford (R-MO-4)
|
(202) 225-2876
|
Rep. Mark Amodei (R-NV-2)
|
(202) 225-6155
|
Rep. Stephanie Bice (R-OK-5)
|
(202) 225-2132
|
Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA-41)
|
(202) 225-1986
|
Rep. John Carter (R-TX-31)
|
(202) 225-3864
|
Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ-6)
|
(202) 225-2542
|
Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA-6)
|
(202) 225-5431
|
Rep. Michael Cloud (R-TX-27)
|
(202) 225-7742
|
Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA-9)
|
(202) 225-9893
|
Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK-4)
|
(202) 225-6165
|
Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL-26)
|
(202) 225-4211
|
Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC-11)
|
(202) 225-6401
|
Rep. Jake Ellzey (R-TX-6)
|
(202) 225-2002
|
Rep. Chuck Fleischmann (R-TN-3)
|
(202) 225-3271
|
Rep. Scott Franklin (R-FL-18)
|
(202) 225-1252
|
Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-TX-23)
|
(202) 225-4511
|
Rep. Michael Guest (R-MS-3)
|
(202) 225-5031
|
Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD-1)
|
(202) 225-5311
|
Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-IA-2)
|
(202) 225-2911
|
Rep. Dave Joyce (R-OH-14)
|
(202) 225-5731
|
Rep. Nick LaLota (R-NY-1)
|
(202) 225-3826
|
Rep. Julia Letlow (R-LA-5)
|
(202) 225-8490
|
Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT-2)
|
(202) 225-9730
|
Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI-2)
|
(202) 225-3561
|
Rep. Riley Moore (R-WV-2)
|
(202) 225-2711
|
Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-WA-4)
|
(202) 225-5816
|
Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA-14)
|
(202) 225-2065
|
Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY-5)
|
(202) 225-4601
|
Rep. John Rutherford (R-FL-5)
|
(202) 225-2501
|
Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID-2)
|
(202) 225-5531
|
Rep. Dale Strong (R-AL-5)
|
(202) 225-4801
|
Rep. David Valadao (R-CA-22)
|
(202) 225-4695
|
Rep. Steve Womack (R-AR-3)
|
(202) 225-4301
|
Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-1)
|
(202) 225-5628
|
Emails of staffers
Emails: megan.medley@mail.
Script for email:
Dear _____
I am writing to alert you that Section 453 of the Federal House Interior Appropriations bill has Total Pesticide Immunity language included in it. Buried in this House spending bill is a provision that would let pesticide companies continue to hide behind outdated EPA pesticide assessments, poisoning our kids with no consequences.
What Section 453 does: Blocks the government from taking any action if it differs in any way from the agency’s most recent health or cancer assessment. Unless they do a new assessment—which takes “no less than four years, and sometimes over 12″ according to EPA—agencies would not be allowed to update safety warnings, food safety tolerances, or guidance even if new science shows harm, even if companies ask for updates, even if the original assessment was based on fraud.
The trap: Pesticide companies need EPA approval to update label warnings. EPA can only act after they perform new health assessments, but the EPA does not do their own scientific tests. Their health assessments rely primarily on unpublished studies paid for by the pesticide company. Pesticide companies have been known to hide evidence, manipulate science, and deny, deny, deny that their products are causing harm. And if they don’t like the outcome of a new EPA health assessment, they will sue to delay it even longer.
Meanwhile: People keep getting cancer. Kids keep getting poisoned. Companies say you “can’t blame us – our product is safe — EPA hasn’t told us to warn anyone!”
Please do the right thing and be certain that Section 453 is deleted from this bill.
Thank you,